Climate Talks, Language, Road to COP21

Semantics, streamlining and a swaggering Russian – A day in the life of the ADP

This article is written by Zacharie Ter-Minassian.

Having always followed the UNFCCC negotiations from afar, entering the charmingly impersonal steel and glass conference center was something of a nightmare come true. Although acquainted for a few years now with the negotiation process, I am still by and large a novice to the physical interactions which occur under –as is customary to say – the “auspices” of the Convention.

Delegates stroll around, grab hasty coffees, pause, vaulted over tables, busying themselves over highlighted strands of paper which are called upon to – one day perhaps – govern the atmospheric concentrations of heat trapping gases that imperil our species’ future. Interns hurry with notes passed around in corridors, while under the tall ceiling stiletto heels clatter alongside the incessant chatter of the climate intelligentsia, reunited with the usual suspects and their best enemies of the negotiations.

Lire la suite « Semantics, streamlining and a swaggering Russian – A day in the life of the ADP »

Climate Politics, Communicating Climate Change, Language

World Leaders Must Promote New Meaning of Progress

This article is written by Henri Landes.

On Tuesday the 25th of June, President Barack Obama delivered a convincing speech on the urgency to act against climate change. His skillful rhetoric and inspiring optimism hopefully persuaded any Americans that still questioned the need to address the issue – politicians of the opposition especially.

After many years of reluctance, the United States should finally “officially” launch itself into the climate change fight, and should do so with an international perspective. Obama’s speech was undoubtedly a strong statement, notably taking into account a complicated international context of economic crisis, and a domestic one of divided politics. However, I would have liked to hear some newer ideas on how to mitigate climate change, as well as a connection drawn between climate change and a global socio-economic crisis.  

With regards to international solutions, Obama primarily stressed ending public financing for coal factories – unless carbon capture is included – trade of clean technologies and both bilateral and international cooperation to increase renewable energy development. As much as these are necessary, these solutions are all relatively consensual and old news in the world of climate activists. Few argue that we need to continue using the dirtiest energy source, and market based solutions for renewable energy upscale already have several success as well as failure stories (the second due in most cases to ineffective regulation and poor investment strategies, i.e. solar energy in France).

Market based solutions to climate change have been the United States’ trademark in international negotiations, to the dismay of developing countries who have looked to the US and other historical polluters for leadership in setting binding greenhouse gas reduction targets and in proposing regulatory measures. These market-based solutions are in my view largely insufficient to tackle climate change, and must be completed with others. The recent curve of global greenhouse gas emissions and climate trends of the past few years are ample proof (storms and flooding in South-East Asia, drought in Africa and in the US, etc.). We are currently on a path of roughly 4 degrees of global warming by 2060, and the next IPCC report in the fall will reveal much more troubling information.

Climate change is a problem of unprecedented nature, and it brings us to a turning point. It has been caused by certain aspects of our economic model of production and consumption, at both national and international levels. The inability of the world economy to effectively internalize the cost of greenhouse gas emissions, environmental degradation and natural resource depletion is undisputed. Lire la suite « World Leaders Must Promote New Meaning of Progress »