Climate Talks, COP24 - Katowice, Negotiation Process

COP24 fails to adopt IPCC report, what does it mean for Nepal?

This article is written by Pramisha Thapaliya.

After two week of the UN climate talks, disputes over a key climate target put Nepal’s glaciers at risk.

The parties failed to reach consensus to welcome the recent IPCC report at COP24. Keeping the climate crisis in view, at COP21, parties agreed to limit the temperature to well below 2ºC above pre-industrial levels; and to limit the increase to 1.5ºC. And during COP 24 at Katowice, parties are working together to create Paris Rulebook, for guiding implementation of Paris Agreement.

img_20181222_231445

Lire la suite « COP24 fails to adopt IPCC report, what does it mean for Nepal? »

Climate Finance, Climate Talks, COP24 - Warsaw, Green Fund

COP24: a toolkit for a better, faster, stronger climate finance?

This article is written by Noémie Robin.

Since the Paris Agreement, it has been agreed that whether they are developed or developing, all countries have to fight against climate change and have to put efforts into the transition toward a low-carbon and resilient economy. Indeed all States need to be involved, because if change occurs only in developed countries, the result would not be enough to reach the target of 1.5°C presented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in their last report in October. But as the article 9 of the Paris Agreement stated, it has been recognized that it would be difficult for developing countries to support the cost of their transition while they do not have the same financial resources or capacities as developed countries. Thus, developed countries have the duty to financially assist developing countries with respect to mitigation and adaptation and they shall lead the climate finance mobilization from a variety of sources, like public funds. In order to insure this transition, $100 billion per year by 2020 have been pledge from industrialized countries to help the poorer countries to achieve their transition toward a green economy.

Lire la suite « COP24: a toolkit for a better, faster, stronger climate finance? »

Climate Talks, COP24 - Katowice

The highs and lows of COP24

This article is written by Sarah Siemers.

cop24 logoThis year’s climate conference in Poland, also known as COP24, was again of great importance. The direction for the further course of global change was meant to be set there and the task was to draw up a set of rules to implement the Paris Agreement.

Lire la suite « The highs and lows of COP24 »

Climate Talks, COP24 - Katowice

On Science and Climate Change, a complicated relationship

This article is written by Shu Ting Julie Zhang. 

When Saudi Arabia calls for waiting on including the 6th IPCC report, because of some “gaps” in the 5th report, it makes me wonder what image of scientists people have. Science is no absolute verity and will never be. Experiments and predictions, especially about climate change, can be wrong. There are always uncertainties and gaps, do you remember Popper’s concept of falsifiability?

from The Economist, Dave Simonds

Lire la suite « On Science and Climate Change, a complicated relationship »

Climate Talks, Loss & Damage

The faith in today’s youth is not nearly Lost & Damaged

This article is written by Viktor Jósa.

CliMates participating in the 7th meeting of the Executive Committee on Loss and Damage associated with Climate Change Impacts.

The concept of « Loss and Damage » is possibly older than your younger sibling. If you were born in the 1990’s, you grew up in the warmest decade ever recorded. If you’re in your teens, almost every year of your life has been one of the hottest years ever recorded[1] – Loss & Damage is the concept of of addressing climate change impacts, negative effects of climate variability and climate change that people have not been able to cope with or adapt to.

In the climate negotiations the concept was initially proposed in the early 1990s by Vanuatu on behalf of the Alliance of Small Island States. A lot later in 2007 at COP13 the concept of addressing Loss & Damage was included in the « Bali Action Plan ».

It only happened in 2013 that the « Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) » to address Loss & Damage associated with the adverse impacts of climate change has been established, which was followed by WIM’s initial 2-year work plan at COP20 in Lima and the creation of the Executive Committee.

Lire la suite « The faith in today’s youth is not nearly Lost & Damaged »

Climate Finance, Climate Talks, COP23 - Fiji & Bonn

Climate finance negotiations and game theory: how a green equilibrium could not be achieved (Part 3)

This article is divided in 3 parts. Read the 1st part here and the 2nd part here.
This article is written by Solène Dengler.

Public and private sector finance is needed to achieve the Paris Agreement objectives

The Paris Agreement sets out two different objectives as regards climate finance: on the one hand developed countries need to invest $100bn dollars per year for mitigation and adaptation projects in developing countries and on the other hand, all finance flows need to progressively be consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.

Lire la suite « Climate finance negotiations and game theory: how a green equilibrium could not be achieved (Part 3) »

Climate Finance, Climate Talks, COP23 - Fiji & Bonn

Climate finance negotiations and game theory: how a green equilibrium could not be achieved (Part 2)

This article is divided in 3 parts. Read the 1st part here and the 3rd part here.
This article is written by Solène Dengler.

Adaptation fund: a weak deal for loss & damage?

According to recent estimates, the costs of adapting to climate change could reach 280-500$ billion per year until 2050 while total bilateral and multilateral funding in developing countries reached 22.5$ billion in 2014. The Fund has been in operation since 2017, has allocated 462 million dollars to 70 adaptation programmes in 58 countries and had a fundraising target of 80 million dollars for 2017 that was surpassed. The numbers speak for themselves, representing a very small fraction of the amount needed for adaptation and loss and damage worldwide, which is often explained by the nature of the fund and the lack of orientation towards scalability of projects.

Lire la suite « Climate finance negotiations and game theory: how a green equilibrium could not be achieved (Part 2) »